Bitcoin-backed credit: new market or old leverage?
In the same week Strategy sold Bitcoin for the first time since 2022 to pay dividends on its credit securities, Metaplanet announced a study to let Bitcoin underwrite Japanese corporate debt. Both are called "digital credit." Only one of them is a new market.
The chain of the argument
On July 6 an SEC filing showed Strategy had sold 3,588 BTC for $216 million at a weighted average of roughly $60,201 — its first sale since 2022. The proceeds did not fund a pivot. They funded distributions on its preferred stock and refilled the dollar reserve that pays them. A week earlier the company had authorised a $1.25 billion Bitcoin monetization programme; it took seven days to use it.
Michael Saylor's framing arrived alongside: Bitcoin is the capital, $STRC is the credit, $MSTR is the equity — three instruments, one asset. Then Simon Gerovich announced Project NOVA, a joint study by Metaplanet, JPYC and Progmat into Bitcoin-backed digital credit for the Japanese mid-market, settled with a yen stablecoin and accruing interest daily. Japanese lender CRYL launched Bitcoin-collateralised loans up to $6.2 million the same week. Jack Mallers' Strike went further and offered loans it says a falling price cannot liquidate.
The market's reaction to the sale is the tell. It rallied. Charles Schwab called it a positive because it eased fears of cascading liquidations — which is a strange compliment to pay a structure that is supposed to be a bridge for institutional capital into Bitcoin.
Preferred distributions and debt service do not care about slogans. They require dollars.
The two sides
For — Bitcoin is becoming real collateral
Metaplanet, Strategy & the builders
Japan's bond market is built for large public issuers and prices out mid-sized firms. Bitcoin-backed credit with 24/7 settlement and daily prorated interest could open that market to them.
@gerovich / MetaplanetOne asset, three instruments for three different buyers: Bitcoin as digital capital, STRC as digital credit, MSTR as digital equity.
@saylorHundreds of trillions of dollars are mandated into equity and credit and cannot hold spot BTC. Treasury companies are the only pipe that capital can use.
Phong Le / Strategy CEOA loan where the price has no say over the collateral: stay current on payments and an 80% drawdown still cannot take your Bitcoin.
@StrikeBitcoin fell 34% but Strategy's coin count rose 89% since the start of 2025, so the reserve is worth more than when the drawdown began. Accumulating through a bear market works.
@AdamBLivThe $13tn asset manager's read: the sale eased fears of cascading liquidations, and the market rewarded it.
Charles Schwab, via @BitcoinMagazineAgainst — it is leverage in a new coat
Watkins, S3, Parker Lewis & the sceptics
The company is called Strategy, but the strategy amounts to buying the top, adding leverage into the fall, and selling at the bottom.
@RyanWatkins_The flywheel only turns while the market grants a premium. Premiums peak near tops and vanish near bottoms, so the structure buys high and is eventually forced to sell low — by design, not by accident.
@BigpictureBTCHarvest the loss on the treasury stock and own the asset instead. Anyone not discounting for asymmetric risk and corporate double taxation is holding the wrong instrument.
@parkeralewisBelow break-even on its Bitcoin and carrying negative carry. If the selling becomes forced rather than chosen, the downside case runs to $20K BTC.
Bob Sloan / @S3PartnersRoughly 200 treasury companies now act as a ball and chain on Bitcoin rather than a channel into it.
Charles Edwards, via @cryptoquant_comSaid by someone who joined a treasury company on the thesis: Bitcoin paired with short-duration debt is dangerous.
@IIICapitalThe practical question nobody has answered: would a CFO actually move if tokenised settlement costs the same and takes as long as the bank loan they already have?
@Ferbin08The exchange, in their words
Why this is an investment question
Two different things are being sold under one label, and the label is doing a lot of work.
The first is a financing structure. A company holds Bitcoin, issues preferred stock and converts against it, and pays a yield. Its engine is the premium the market assigns to its own shares: while the stock trades above the value of the Bitcoin it holds, issuing new shares buys more Bitcoin per share and the flywheel turns. When the premium goes, issuance stops being accretive and the dollars for the coupon have to come from somewhere. They came from 3,588 coins. Strategy's multiple to the value of its holdings now sits near 0.65x, against roughly 1.2x in the last bear market when Bitcoin was a third of today's price. The market is not repricing Bitcoin. It is repricing the mechanism.
The second is collateral. A borrower pledges Bitcoin and receives credit against it. There is no premium, no flywheel and no reflexivity — just an LTV, a rate, and a liquidation policy. That is what Project NOVA, CRYL and Strike are building, and it is a genuinely new market: Bitcoin's use case shifting from an asset you hold to an asset that underwrites other people's debt. JPMorgan's counter is that Bitcoin only survives as digital gold. Metaplanet is betting the opposite — that the endgame is collateral.
Conflating the two is how investors end up buying the leverage while thinking they bought the rail.
The desk read
Own the collateral rail. Do not pay a premium for the wrapper.
The treasury-company trade has already broken and the tape has said so. Its only real moat was being the sole route for mandated capital to touch Bitcoin, and spot ETFs removed that moat. What remains is a levered holder with a coupon to service, a structure that must sell its asset into weakness — and the market now applauds when it does, which tells you the market sees these vehicles as a source of supply, not demand. K Wave Media has gone from a 10,000 BTC target to zero coins; Empery Digital sold 1,400 BTC and stopped reporting NAV on its Bitcoin at all. Treat a sub-1x multiple not as a discount to buy but as an accurate quote. If you want the exposure, own the asset.
The lending side is where the structural bet is, and it is early enough to be honest about what is unproven. Strike's promise that price cannot liquidate you is not magic: someone is absorbing that volatility, and Strike has not said who. Project NOVA is a study, not a product, and the sceptics in Gerovich's own replies are asking the right question — whether a Japanese CFO switches for settlement that costs the same as the bank loan they already have. So watch two things. First, whether any of these books survive a fast drawdown without socialising losses. Second, the July 30 Strategy call, the first since the sale — because how a levered holder explains selling into weakness is how you learn what the rest of the 200 will do when it is their turn. The rail is the trade. The wrapper is the exit.
Charles Edwards on why 200 treasury companies weigh on Bitcoin — via @cryptoquant_com
Keep reading
How crypto and TradFi converge · What RWA tokenization actually is · All notes